We don't need to shrink the regular season

Just because there's a little weather this year, one Atlanta Journal Constitution writer thinks it is time to re-examine Bud Selig's wishes to shorten the regular season.

ll baseball had to do was listen to Selig and do something such as go from 162 games to 154 in the regular season. Then the division series would begin no later than the last week of September instead of early October. Then you wouldn’t have what you have now: A World Series featuring television ratings dropping as fast as the temperature in Philadelphia.

With game-time temperatures slated for the low 40s (with the wind-chill factor in the upper 20s) tonight, the Phillies are scheduled to hit in the bottom of the sixth inning during their suspended Game 5 against the Tampa Bay Rays.

No, that's not necessary. If baseball starts on April 1st, and gets the regular season in by the end of September, shrinks the off days in the postseason to one day between series and has weekend world series day games, well, then life is good in baseball again.

Verducci on Bud's Bungle

Tom Verducci backs the commissioner's decision-making on Monday night.

Give credit to commissioner Bud Selig and the umpires working World Series Game 5. They did their best to get the game played, given the weather forecast information available to them, made the right call to suspend the game when conditions grew unplayable -- the pelting rain continued for hours -- and sent people home quickly without wasting time trying to divine when the next "window" might be available to resume play. Too often we jump on baseball when things don't go according to script. But Selig has stepped up twice in this World Series with the right response to rain issues. He insisted Game 3 be played, even with a 10:06 p.m. start time after a 91-minute delay, in part because he knew of the terrible conditions forecast for Tuesday, the next available off day. The game was played in fine weather and field conditions.

Perhaps, but the game could've easily been suspended in the fifth. I talked to a meteorologist about the rain system moving through the Northeast. He told me it would intensify and last through the rest of Monday, easily. There's no way this game should've been pushed through to the bottom of the fifth and beyond.

Bemused by Bud

Baseball Musings is one of the few (only?) writers to come to Bud Selig's defense, citing the rulebook for postponements to show that the commissioner did the right thing in waiting for a tie before calling game five.

Commissioner Selig cited rule 4.12a, section 6, in explaining the suspension of Game 5. According to the rule, "a game shall become a suspended game that must be completed at a future date" for a number of reasons, with section 6 specifying "a regulation game that is called with the score tied."

In this scenario, the rule (4.12c) for suspended games is enacted: "A suspended game shall be resumed at the exact point of suspension of the original game. The completion of a suspended game is a continuation of the original game. The lineup and batting order of both teams shall be exactly the same as the lineup and batting order at the moment of suspension, subject to the rules governing substitution. Any player may be replaced by a player who had not been in the game prior to the suspension. No player removed before the suspension may be returned to the lineup."

Prior to the introduction of this rule following the 2006 season, the suspended game would have reverted back to the beginning of the inning, with the Phillies leading, 2-1, since Philadelphia did not bat in the bottom of the inning. But that is no longer the case and therefore Game 5 will resume with the score tied at 2.

However, Selig would not have allowed the reversion to 2-1 anyway. While Phillies fans might have liked that, Rays fans would have gone through the roof. Selig would have suspended the game no matter what, which would be the right thing to do.

I'm not a big Selig fan, but MLB handled this series in Philadelphia correctly. The wait on Saturday night was due to the bad weather reports for Monday and Tuesday. They had a weather report that the rain Monday night was going to be light enough for the field to absorb. When that proved to be wrong, they suspended the game. They were placed in a bad situation due to the forces of nature, and their decisions were logical. They should be taking too much heat over this.

OK, but if the commissioner would not have allowed a reversion for a 2-1 Phillies' rain-shortened win, couldn't he have asked for the tarp before the game went official in the 5th? There was a downpour for quite some time, and any amateur meteorologist looking at the radar could see the heavier stuff was coming for hours ahead. Heck, I've been to games with preemptive rain delays minutes before the hard stuff falls. Rather than make "logical" decisions after miring yourself in the muck, why not make a better decision before you get stuck? Baseball could have and should have postponed this one much earlier.

Why wait for the Rays to score a run in the slop?

Update: Another voice saying that the game should've been suspended before we hit the midway point of the fifth.

Simply put, Game 5 is hopelessly tainted by what transpired between the time the game should have been called and the middle of the sixth inning, when it was finally suspended.

Whatever happens when play resumes, whether the Phillies celebrate their first World Series championship or the Rays force a Game 6 in Florida, MLB can't justify its decision or its decision-making process.

Bud is bad, Buck is bad

I count lots of anti-Bud stories today. Selig is really getting thrown under the bus for last night's nonsense. As Ken Rosenthal said, it's the freaking World Series! Get it right!

Bud Selig makes a bad call for baseball
Thank god the Rays scored, and that Bud Selig is a boob
Selig and company all wet when it comes to Series scheduling

And Joe Buck takes some well-deserved heat as well:
Joe Buck is a freaking MORON

There's been a lot of bad at this World Series.

Does a bad economy affect sports? Youbetcha

USA Today publishes this article, which deals with sports and money across the spectrum. It's a pretty interesting read. Baseball receives a blurb just short of halfway down.

Major League Baseball: Attendance fell this season after four straight record years, proving commissioner Bud Selig was wrong when he estimated the sport could break 80 million in attendance for the first time. But the economic slowdown is felt beyond the turnstiles: Team coverage in many newspapers has been cut back, leading to a decreased presence in print for teams. And MLB expects a decrease in car ads - long a major sponsor - forcing clubs and networks to search for other advertisers.

Sales of licensed goods - such as jerseys and caps - is flat when compared with last year. It would be down factoring out the All-Star game at Yankee Stadium, which produced extra revenue.

Imagine that, Bud Selig was wrong. Never!

Don't worry, Bud, Spitting Seeds will always write articles on you and baseball; there will be no shrinking column inches here. That's perhaps good for baseball, but not for you, Bud.